 Dominic Deegan Fansite
|
| | Nevrmore: To ban or not to ban | |
| Goto page : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
| Should Nevrmore be banned? | | No. | | 44% | [ 8 ] | | Yes, but only a temporary ban. | | 16% | [ 3 ] | | Yes, permanent ban. | | 38% | [ 7 ] |
| | Total Votes : 18 | | |
| | Author | Message |
|---|
Dotty

Age : 26 Joined : 24 May 2007 Posts : 627 Location : Full of ORGASMIC pie!
| Subject: Re: Nevrmore: To ban or not to ban Fri Jul 20, 2007 4:37 pm | |
| Testimony? I can only really speak on what I know. I can understand a temp-ban from the chatbox; he was being a douchebag for the sake of being a douchebag. That is who he is, and he is typically proud of it when he gets a point across.
I do feel a permaban is completely out of line, considering how feelings were hurt, it would seem somewhat silly. Hell, I was raped before, and I've openly discussed that in the "justified rape" discussions, which have gotten quite heated. From personal experience, what I read that was cried over wasn't really justified...but I am also not that person, so I don't know.
One point I have to toss out is that yes, Nevrmore is a troll, but if you're respectful to what he says and engage him in discussion, and ignore his sarcastic snide remarks (that other people here make, from the likes of tender, to parts of the local modsquad) he is generally a fairly thoughtful fella, who can be nice, and quite open to discussing things with a healthy (but sarcastic) dose of civility.
You'll note he liked me, once he figured out who I was. I'm not exactly the most trolling person on the internet, I'd like to think. If I was to guess, he probably liked me because I'm willing to entertain his thoughts and engage him in discussion on a wide variety of topics, and not immediately label him a bunch of angry, mean words. Are there people on the Keenspot forum that get under my skin? Plenty. Some of them are so abrasive with their personal attacks, be they outright, or be they hidden that I'd swear they were made of sandpaper.
Nevrmore is not one of those people. He has the ability to stick to the topic at hand, as opposed to resorting to blatent personal jabs. Really, he's one of the softer, plushier, more huggable trolls I've ever met. You just have to be willing to get to know him.
Kind of like those other trolls on our fansite forums. People like tender. tender has managed to get under my skin COUNTLESS times, due to constant personal jabs stuck in-between his comic discussion posts, but we keep him around. Why? Because he's not really a bad fella. He just likes making random sarcastic jabs at people. Just like some other guy...what was his name?
| The Dotty wrote: | | Nevrmore! |
Last edited by on Fri Jul 20, 2007 4:38 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|  | | Maulkin Shivering Isles Resident


Joined : 26 Mar 2007 Posts : 9154
| Subject: Re: Nevrmore: To ban or not to ban Fri Jul 20, 2007 4:38 pm | |
| Edit: This is at The Lost Eye, since Dotty ninja'd me.
Did you not read the last post?
Okay, I only want people with over a hundred posts (ie, those with an actual interest in this forum) to post here. Anything else will be deleted. _________________
|
|  | | LadyMacbeth Honor and Virtue


Joined : 31 Mar 2007 Posts : 4278
| Subject: Re: Nevrmore: To ban or not to ban Fri Jul 20, 2007 4:39 pm | |
| Why not just lock it? Have those involved PM you. _________________ This signature is a line of text meant to signal you that the post you are reading has ended. You may stop at any time, for everyone knows that attempts at a witty piece of writing usually fail. Nothing to see here.
Are you still reading this? No, seriously. You can stop now.
Fine. I'll write smaller. Stop now. Go away.
Please?
Did you honestly copy/enlarge this? Hahahahahaha |
|  | | Dotty

Age : 26 Joined : 24 May 2007 Posts : 627 Location : Full of ORGASMIC pie!
| Subject: Re: Nevrmore: To ban or not to ban Fri Jul 20, 2007 4:40 pm | |
| | I posted! I posted! :P |
|  | | Maulkin Shivering Isles Resident


Joined : 26 Mar 2007 Posts : 9154
| Subject: Re: Nevrmore: To ban or not to ban Fri Jul 20, 2007 4:43 pm | |
| | Dotty wrote: | | I do feel a permaban is completely out of line, considering how feelings were hurt, it would seem somewhat silly. Hell, I was raped before, and I've openly discussed that in the "justified rape" discussions, which have gotten quite heated. From personal experience, what I read that was cried over wasn't really justified...but I am also not that person, so I don't know. |
Which is why he has only been banned for five days (as opposed to the original permaban), and is banned from the chatbox until further notice.
| Quote: | | Kind of like those other trolls on our fansite forums. People like tender. tender has managed to get under my skin COUNTLESS times, due to constant personal jabs stuck in-between his comic discussion posts, but we keep him around. Why? Because he's not really a bad fella. He just likes making random sarcastic jabs at people. Just like some other guy...what was his name? |
If you feel that Tender has been insulting/trollish, then please PM the evidence to one of the mods (or me). _________________
|
|  | | Dotty

Age : 26 Joined : 24 May 2007 Posts : 627 Location : Full of ORGASMIC pie!
| Subject: Re: Nevrmore: To ban or not to ban Fri Jul 20, 2007 4:57 pm | |
| He hasn't been in a while. I used to call him out on it all the time, though. The response was something along the lines of "you can't have sweet without the sour".
Well, he might be, but I don't notice. Most of the stuff he did came when I was basically spazzing over the rape stuff, and we were debating just how well (or horribly) the storyline was pulled off. |
|  | | PinkSpider Left the forum


Age : 23 Joined : 13 Apr 2007 Posts : 1787 Location : Awesomania
| Subject: Re: Nevrmore: To ban or not to ban Fri Jul 20, 2007 5:55 pm | |
| Yes, Nevrmore's been a member since April in a forum that's only existed since March. Plus, he was a member of Keenspot.
Let's go over a few things
A) Nevrmore's been a forum member a while, and has made it very apparent that he is, in fact, a dick, and a troll.
B) No one had complained thusfar, for months, about anything he has said.
C) Lord Golbez, Tender, Links, Freemage, and myself, have ALL been at LEAST as dickish as Nevr in the past. Most of us have, actually.
D) Suddenly someone complains and his usergroup is changed with NO WARNING. (unless you sent him a PM which I wasn't told about)
E) He is set up for a perma-ban through a POLL with no warning
F) Before the poll is done he IS perma-banned, although luckily it was rescinded to a temp-ban.
G) After the fact, you set up a rule system so you can feel like the "justice" you meted out wasn't a total sham.
I'm not important, and I'm not making a threat, I just want to state now, and clearly, that I think Maulkin handled this rather terribly, and, along with other offenses (such as post edits, sig edits, etc, just for lols) I don't really feel like this is a good community. I do like just about everyone here, but I'm not going to deal with that crap.
So, as said, if the horrible adminship continues I will leave the forum. It's not a threat, or a defense of anyone. What it is is a simple statement of complete dissaproval of how this forum has as yet been handled. |
|  | | Maulkin Shivering Isles Resident


Joined : 26 Mar 2007 Posts : 9154
| Subject: Re: Nevrmore: To ban or not to ban Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:35 pm | |
| One hour left until I close the thread. _________________
|
|  | | MGL

Age : 23 Joined : 07 Apr 2007 Posts : 1015 Location : Objection!
| Subject: I just wish I could repost what synk wrote. Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:48 pm | |
| I have little to add beyond voicing my agreement with Spider.
Additionally, I consider deleting the posts of those with fewer than 100 posts, claiming they have nothing to add to this dialog, to be in extremely poor taste. _________________ Rules of the Culture of Nice [list][*]First Law: A person may not criticize a webcomic, or, through inaction, allow a webcomic to be criticized. [*]Second Law: A person must only say things that are pleasing to webcomic creators except where such things would conflict with the First Law. [*]Third Law: A webcomic creator must protect his or her creation from criticism as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.[/list:u] |
|  | | Maulkin Shivering Isles Resident


Joined : 26 Mar 2007 Posts : 9154
| Subject: Re: Nevrmore: To ban or not to ban Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:53 pm | |
| He disobeyed a clear and unambiguous rule. If he had a problem with it, he could have PMed me. Or, if you think he has a valid point to add, you could restate it.
Besides, I'm closing the thread in a few minutes. _________________
|
|  | | [Banned by request] Left the forum

Joined : 29 Apr 2007 Posts : 732
| Subject: Re: Nevrmore: To ban or not to ban Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:54 pm | |
| I agree that the 100-post floor is a bit much, seeing as how Dotty (whom I would regard as a serious poster here) only has 200.
Everything else I might've added regarding relative severity of violations has pretty much been said already. |
|  | | Maulkin Shivering Isles Resident


Joined : 26 Mar 2007 Posts : 9154
| Subject: Re: Nevrmore: To ban or not to ban Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:32 pm | |
| Topic has been locked. _________________
|
|  | | Maulkin Shivering Isles Resident


Joined : 26 Mar 2007 Posts : 9154
| Subject: Re: Nevrmore: To ban or not to ban Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:05 pm | |
| Update: Because there was some confusion about the punishment (I reduced the punishment in the second page, I think), I will state it again:
-Banned from the forum for 5 days (which will be lifted on the morning of the 24) -Banned from the chatbox until further notice (until he can show the mods that the problem won't happen again). _________________
|
|  | | Maulkin Shivering Isles Resident


Joined : 26 Mar 2007 Posts : 9154
| Subject: Re: Nevrmore: To ban or not to ban Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:57 pm | |
| (Nevrmore has been unbanned) _________________
|
|  | | | Nevrmore: To ban or not to ban | |
|
| Page 7 of 7 | Goto page : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
| | Permissions of this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| | |
| |
|