Dominic Deegan Fansite

HomeFAQSearchRegisterLog in
 

14/09/07 Milov SMASH

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Goto page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
AuthorMessage
Noxy
>->O
>->O



Joined : 21 Jul 2007
Posts : 233

PostSubject: Re: 14/09/07 Milov SMASH   Sat Sep 15, 2007 9:29 am

Me Talking wrote:
And murder is usually cardinal sin number 1 in most religious orders.


More like number two, in Judaism and Christianity at least. That commandment comes right after the one telling you to honour your parents. So make sure you do what mommy and daddy want or you go to hell and burn for all eternity.

PinkSpider wrote:
while Dominic rationally DECIDED not to save Siggy's father because he decided he was not a good person.


I'm so glad you or Dominic aren't doctors. I guess the hypocratic oath applies only to them. Oh well, such is death.

[quote"PinkSpider"]As for Stonewater.... that is a bad argument to make.[/quote]

Both do their darndest to act on good intentions and end up doing atrocious things. The only difference is that Stonewater had the chance to atone for his past actions, but Siegfried was thrown into a situation where literally all hell broke loose, and when things calmed down, all he could do was ask for forgiveness, because he couldn't atone for what he did a mere hour ago, because, you know, he was dying.

PinkSpider wrote:
I really hope this forum doesn't have to suffer through the consequences of making that argument once again, but if it does, I blame you.


I will put this as eloquently as I can: You suck.

It takes more than one person to argue, if you know what I mean, which, honestly, I doubt you do.

Besides, if you think Siegfried deserves hell, then that's okay, so why would it be wrong for another person to think that Stonewater deserves hell?

Jhaiisiin wrote:
I assume nothing


Which is funny because

Jhaiisiin wrote:
Dotty, here's the thing I'm noticing. You love Sigfried to a fault.


you're making assumptions about Dotty's motives.

It's a trend I am noticing: Everytime somebody disagrees with Siegfried deserving hell, they MUST be a die-hard Siegfried fan. Do you know what it's called? Ad Hominem. Whether consciously or not, you try to make her opinion appear less valid by depicting her as having an irrational liking of Siegfried and therefore not able to think clearly on this.

In short, you're an ass.
Back to top Go down
Maulkin
Shivering Isles Resident
Shivering Isles Resident



Joined : 26 Mar 2007
Posts : 9698

PostSubject: Re: 14/09/07 Milov SMASH   Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:26 am

Noxy wrote:
Me Talking wrote:
And murder is usually cardinal sin number 1 in most religious orders.


More like number two, in Judaism and Christianity at least. That commandment comes right after the one telling you to honour your parents. So make sure you do what mommy and daddy want or you go to hell and burn for all eternity.



Exodus 20:12

"Honor your father and mother, that your days may be long upon the land which the Lord your God has given you."

Not obey, honor. If they tell you to do something obviously wrong, you don't have to do it because that would not be honorable to them. This goes into greater detail.

“For sin shall not be your master, because you are not under law, but under grace.” Romans 6:14

Odds are, if “mommy and daddy” are telling you to do this based on what it says in the Bible, they are Christian and you are Christian as well. So, no, you’re not going to go to hell for all eternity if you’re already saved by Christ.

Sorry, I just have to call "shenanigans" when someone propagates one of the prevelant myths about the Bible.
_________________
Spoiler:
 
Back to top Go down
Miles Edgeworth
Left the forum
Left the forum



Age : 23
Joined : 18 Apr 2007
Posts : 920
Location : In the Phoenix Wright spritey bandwagon.

PostSubject: Re: 14/09/07 Milov SMASH   Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:53 am

It's a good thing that whole parent thing is just about honoring, cause if it was to obey, well... I would already have my ticket to Hell just for moving to a country seen as the true den of evil by my current fellow citizens.

However honoring is a bit hard at times ever since they divorced... meh.

Anyway, as for Siggy, even though I REALLY liked that guy, I won't deny he deserved Hell, he's done too much wrong already (which was really entertaining). Besides, he seems to have fun slicing demons!
_________________
Also known as Undead Katharos


Brought to life by the collective insanity of the Dominic Deegan Fansite.
Back to top Go down
Dotty




Age : 26
Joined : 24 May 2007
Posts : 627
Location : Full of ORGASMIC pie!

PostSubject: Re: 14/09/07 Milov SMASH   Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:16 pm

I can agree to disagree, since we're both not likely to budge, BUT you should note Siggy was being attacked when he took out the guards. You should also note people do snap into blind rages (which Siggy is known for, it's what I suggest is his mental illness - comparable to someone who has done too much E...drains their Serotonin levels permenantly, and then they're prone to wild mood swings. just like Siggy! So either Siggy is addicted to Ecstacy, or he has a problem with mood swings) when someone they love is taken from them, particularily in such a gruesome manner. Was it entirely Dominics fault? No. The Orc guy killed Siggys dad. But Dominic played god, and said he wouldn't help, so he's pretty darned guilty in that aspect.

Finally, Siggy -DID- try to atone for his past sins prior to the war in hell. I suggest you re-read the Scarlatti bit. He preaches to Scarlatti about Scarlatti being a thug for hire, and how he lived that life once, and he was trying to better himself, and make up for all the shitty things he did in the past.

I honestly think Mookie realized if everyone was redeemed in his comic, it would have little story to pursue. So he demonized Siggy in the last arc Siggy lived in, so he could become a bad guy later on in the comic. I also think Mookie made the demonizing a grey area on purpose, so people could decide for themselves if Siggy was truly evil, or mentally unbalanced. I choose the latter, because in all previous instances of Siggy doing bad things, he was doing it with the ideal of justice in mind.

As for your point regarding Callan hiring a bunch of thugs, I think that was already proven in that War in Hell arc, and the Scarlatti duel. The other knights seem to be pretty darn corrupt, iirc. The only one who ever seemed to be actually redeemed was....reinholt, was it? The one Dominic said he forsaw in an old folks home festering in his own filth.

And no, I do not love siggy to a fault. I see his issues for what they are; a mental illness, very comparable to someone who has depleted Serotonin levels (E-addicts) or other mental diseases where the person afflicted is prone to wild mood swings. There IS a reason prozak exists, right?

Furthermore, I think it's unfair that people are so quick to dismiss him, and say he deserved hell, when he was obviously at war with himself, internally. He tried to better things, but for the sake of the plot, he had to be made to be twisted, so he could go to hell, and give us the arc we're reading now. Kinda like how Stonewater HAD to rape melna, to give them the relationship they currently have. This is the only reason I ever said Stonewater deserves to go to hell, if Siggy does. The only difference between the two, is Stonewater was given an honest chance to make up for what he did, and is a much less mentally unstable character. Siggy recanted on his deathbed, after an apparent series of failures to try and control his anger management problem. He was forgiven, as well, but didn't get his last rites, so he was taken to hell by Karnak (as is my understanding).

The first step to redeeming the self is to admit you have a problem. Siggy did that. The second, is to take small steps to change, and work on your issues. He did that. The third, is to have some friends catch you if you slip up. For some reason, Jayden and Milov never seemed to fit this bill. They just sort of told him to stop beating crippled people with their own walking sticks. (Which he was doing because he was in a rage, again, doing it for the name of justice, because an entire town told the knights that Dominic & co. were evil wizards.)

Again, if you want to stop going back and forth with this, that's fine. I just tend to stick up for those that people seem to easily dismiss as "unfixable" and "deserving of hell". He didn't really do anything that could qualify as "out of the norm" for someone with a mental illness whos fathers head landed in his lap. Everything he did was for Justice. Unfortunately, Callan justice is a twisted justice...and I think as Siggy was dying, he was truly sorry for everything horrible that he had done. He showed it when he made the other knights back off during the duel, and during the War in Hell, the only people he attacked were the ones attacking him (mind controlled knights) and the one asshole who played god, resulting in his father being killed (Dominic). Also, that Orc fella. But I think we all agree that particular orc was pretty evil.

I mean...are all mentally unstable racist people in the modern world deserving of hell? No. They deserve help. Something Siggy was never provided. Stonewater was. That's pretty much the only thing saving his green ass from burning in the brimstone, because rape is most definitely a sin.

But I suppose, as I said, the road to hell is paved with good intentions...
Back to top Go down
Jhaiisiin




Age : 29
Joined : 03 May 2007
Posts : 163
Location : Albuquerque

PostSubject: Re: 14/09/07 Milov SMASH   Sat Sep 15, 2007 6:52 pm

Noxy wrote:
Jhaiisiin wrote:
I assume nothing


Which is funny because

Jhaiisiin wrote:
Dotty, here's the thing I'm noticing. You love Sigfried to a fault.


you're making assumptions about Dotty's motives.

Funny that, because you must have missed the line where I stated that was my OPINION.

Noxy wrote:
It's a trend I am noticing: Everytime somebody disagrees with Siegfried deserving hell, they MUST be a die-hard Siegfried fan. Do you know what it's called? Ad Hominem. Whether consciously or not, you try to make her opinion appear less valid by depicting her as having an irrational liking of Siegfried and therefore not able to think clearly on this.

I'm not trying to invalidate her opinion. I simply stating my opinion as to the foundation of her beliefs, which you'll note she corrected me on. And as such, I'm willing to concede I misinterpreted her. To Dotty, my apologies on my opinion of your reasons being misguided.

Noxy wrote:
In short, you're an ass.

Funny that, as you're the only one taking personal shots here. Maybe the target of your insult should have been yourself.

Dotty wrote:
You should also note people do snap into blind rages

I know this all too well, actually. RL info here: I've been prone to them in the past. I overcame them, not with drugs or massive doses of therapy or electroshock or any of those things, but honest hard work. I did see a psychologist for a short bit. They provided me the tools, and I work constantly to keep my anger in check. It's easier now out of practice, but sometimes it's still there under the surface. I've had to work at it though, and for a time, it was a daily thing. I just don't see that same work from Sigfried. The problem there of course is we can't see what happens off panel in Siggy's life. Maybe he was working on it. Maybe he wasn't. Maybe no one showed him how. We simply don't know. What we do know is that right up to the end, he was still prone to those rages and the violence that came with it. Trying to fix something only counts for so much. Eventually there must be results.

Dotty wrote:
Finally, Siggy -DID- try to atone for his past sins prior to the war in hell. I suggest you re-read the Scarlatti bit. He preaches to Scarlatti about Scarlatti being a thug for hire, and how he lived that life once, and he was trying to better himself, and make up for all the shitty things he did in the past.

And that's where we see things differently. I see him saying he's a new man, and he's changed, etc etc, and then I see his actions saying something entirely different, something Scarlatti pointed out in that same conversation. It's not just what he's accomplishing, it's how he's accomplishing things. Yes, he detained corrupt knights, but he did it through bloodshed and violence. Heck, he burst on scene by knocking teeth out. Not even so much as a "Halt! You're all under arrest" or anything. But then, that's never been his way.

Dotty wrote:
And no, I do not love siggy to a fault. I see his issues for what they are; a mental illness, very comparable to someone who has depleted Serotonin levels (E-addicts) or other mental diseases where the person afflicted is prone to wild mood swings. There IS a reason prozak exists, right?

Fair enough, you have my apologies then. As to prozak, let's not start on that topic at all. I'll have a violent outburst myself.

Dotty wrote:
(Which he was doing because he was in a rage, again, doing it for the name of justice, because an entire town told the knights that Dominic & co. were evil wizards.)

Uh, he was in a rage that time because he had a simple White magic spell called "Weight" cast on his SWORD. No harm done to anyone. Hell, that spell was likely intended to make it harder for him to inflict harm. Lotta good it did though.

Dotty wrote:
...and I think as Siggy was dying, he was truly sorry for everything horrible that he had done.

In this, you and I can agree. I agree he probably was truly sorry for the life he'd lived. Based on the events that followed, it appears that wasn't enough though. Going WAY back in history to Ma'at for an analogy, he had his heart weighed, it outweighed the feather and his soul was forfeit (okay, in Egyptian culture, the soul was devoured if it didn't live Ma'at, but the analogy stands)

Dotty wrote:
I mean...are all mentally unstable racist people in the modern world deserving of hell? No. They deserve help.

I agree.

Dotty wrote:
Something Siggy was never provided.

But we don't know that for certain. That was off panel, and thus we can only speculate. (FYI, Noxy, THIS is what the assumption comment dealt with, since in my OPINION, you missed the reference) It seems to me you're filling in the blanks with "he never got help", I'm just seeing them as blanks with an unknown that Mookie could fill in later. It's not an unreasonable speculation either way though. I see where you're coming from, I just don't agree with it is all.


So yeah, I said I'd agree to disagree, but it seems we're having a decent, civil debate/discussion here. (We are still civil, yes? I'm not trying to belittle you or anything, contrary to Noxy's "observation")
_________________
A healthy dose of insanity each day keeps a person sane.

"This looks like a job for Emergency Pants!"
- Torg of Sluggy Freelance
Back to top Go down
PinkSpider
Left the forum
Left the forum



Age : 23
Joined : 13 Apr 2007
Posts : 1788
Location : Awesomania

PostSubject: Re: 14/09/07 Milov SMASH   Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:39 pm

Noxy wrote:

I will put this as eloquently as I can: You suck.

It takes more than one person to argue, if you know what I mean, which, honestly, I doubt you do.

Besides, if you think Siegfried deserves hell, then that's okay, so why would it be wrong for another person to think that Stonewater deserves hell?

See, the funny thing is you misunderstood me. I meant that Dominic was WRONG for not saving Siggy's father, and I believe Stonewater should not have been/should be redeemed, but I wished to avoid the subject because that particular arc tends to set off everyone's ire.

In any case, you're arguing against my arguments with my arguments. So it appears we agree.... so yeah....
_________________
Quote:
"Love is an irresistible desire to be irresistibly desired."


Fantastic
Back to top Go down
[Banned by request]
Left the forum
Left the forum



Joined : 29 Apr 2007
Posts : 732

PostSubject: Re: 14/09/07 Milov SMASH   Sat Sep 15, 2007 9:59 pm

Dotty: I take it by 'refusing to help' Siggy's father, you're refering to this scene? I'm going to point out something--Dominic refused... nothing. He was simply overcome. People 'playing God' don't stand there blubbering like a schoolgirl with a skinned knee.

In fact, he was the one who set up the events that ultimately released Siggy's dad from the Infernomancer's control.

So, actually, y'know, Dominic had already done everything he could to help Siggy's dad. His 'refusal', as you're portraying it, was simply being emotionally stunned into silence and tears after seeing the atrocities Siggy's dad had committed, and how he'd encouraged his son to do the same.

Unfortunately, the Butcher was, in the end, too hate-filled to be able to take advantage of it. Had he and Dom teamed up, they could very likely have faced down the Infernomancer. Instead, he ended up as a hood ornament.

Now, in Siggy's defense, he didn't know or understand all of that. Things did happen too fast for him to catch up. But even then, I'm sorry--but deciding that your first course of action is killing the guy whom you think 'did nothing', instead of going after the guy who actually killed your father, is succumbing to the same rage that ruled Siggy's whole life.

Finally: The chemical imbalance/tormented upbringing defense is, oddly, both the best and the worst in the bunch. In the real world, I'm actually inclined to accept it (in the sense that I think that people with such problems should be treated rather than simply tossed into a cell). So the question becomes, do such things exist in the world of Dominic Deegan? If so--if brain chemistry and upbringing can be shown to be the primary drives in a person, and someone's actions are simply the emergent product of environmental conditions, then why is there a "Heaven" or "Hell" at all? After all, Siggy's father probably shared the same genetic flaw, and would've been raised in a similar fashion--and also fought in the war, and we've seen plenty of evidence about what war can do to even seemingly stable individuals in the real world. But, no, these people have souls. We've seen them; and while these souls can be influenced with dark magics, a person is otherwise generally responsible for the state of their being. (Mind you, this failing could also be attributed to more of Mookie's helter-skelter world-building approach.)


Last edited by on Sun Sep 16, 2007 8:11 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
Dotty




Age : 26
Joined : 24 May 2007
Posts : 627
Location : Full of ORGASMIC pie!

PostSubject: Re: 14/09/07 Milov SMASH   Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:27 am

Two things to touch on. He called Siggys dad a monster, and that stare isn't one where you're overcome with grief. That stare is a "No. I'm not going to help him, because he's a horrible monster." Thus why Siggy smacks him in the face. It's one of the few times Siggy wailed on someone where I actually agreed with it. Dominic needed that. Playing god is a no-no.

It also reminds me how much I miss colored strips over the one-panel copouts. T_T

As for the heaven/hell thing, I'm going to go with the helter-skelter approach, because they obviously understand mental illness to some degree; Snowsong got off pretty easy considering what she did. They said they were going to get her help. I was also under the impression Karnak took Siggys soul, as opposed to that being where it would naturally go....as Karnak interrupted the last rites with OH NO YOU DON'T, HE'S MINE! suggesting if Dominic did get those last rites off, Siggy would go to heaven....or that Siggy would go to heaven for finally realizing everything he did wrong, and being honestly sorry for it, and Karnak said "nuh-uh."

I'm going to assume this is a power of the Demon of Wounds, since Siggy was very wounded, it would make him vulnerable, or something. The whole soul-taking thing wasn't really explained.
Back to top Go down
Iron King




Joined : 07 Aug 2007
Posts : 417
Location : The Best Penal Colony Ever

PostSubject: Re: 14/09/07 Milov SMASH   Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:12 am

The problem with arguing whether Siggy will go to heaven or hell is we don't know what the pre-requisites are for either. Well that's not true. If you outright barter with demons, you go to hell. Not much has been portrayed about heaven, besides Klo-tark qualifying for it. It's possible that he became a Luanian worshiper whilst studying under Acibek, but otherwise we can assume that being a good guy all round will get you into heaven.

It might actually be that Siggy was just going to meet the man at the gates and have all his deeds weighed up to see whether he gets in or not. Who knows. Anyway, I'll agree to disagree on this one.

P.S. I don't see the problem with raising Stonewater as a topic at this point in time. I think most of us have come to terms with what was portrayed within the arc, and whether or not we agree or disagree, we can at least rationally discuss it.
Back to top Go down
Jhaiisiin




Age : 29
Joined : 03 May 2007
Posts : 163
Location : Albuquerque

PostSubject: Re: 14/09/07 Milov SMASH   Sun Sep 16, 2007 5:45 am

Dotty wrote:
Thus why Siggy smacks him in the face. It's one of the few times Siggy wailed on someone where I actually agreed with it. Dominic needed that. Playing god is a no-no.

So if someone refused to help one of your family members, you'd be okay with nearly killing them for it? Because Siggy didn't just "smack" Dominic. He tried to kill him. The knight coming into the room is the only reason he didn't.
_________________
A healthy dose of insanity each day keeps a person sane.

"This looks like a job for Emergency Pants!"
- Torg of Sluggy Freelance
Back to top Go down
PinkSpider
Left the forum
Left the forum



Age : 23
Joined : 13 Apr 2007
Posts : 1788
Location : Awesomania

PostSubject: Re: 14/09/07 Milov SMASH   Sun Sep 16, 2007 6:59 am

Judge not lest ye be judged.
_________________
Quote:
"Love is an irresistible desire to be irresistibly desired."


Fantastic
Back to top Go down
Dotty




Age : 26
Joined : 24 May 2007
Posts : 627
Location : Full of ORGASMIC pie!

PostSubject: Re: 14/09/07 Milov SMASH   Sun Sep 16, 2007 4:01 pm

Jhaiisiin wrote:
Dotty wrote:
Thus why Siggy smacks him in the face. It's one of the few times Siggy wailed on someone where I actually agreed with it. Dominic needed that. Playing god is a no-no.

So if someone refused to help one of your family members, you'd be okay with nearly killing them for it? Because Siggy didn't just "smack" Dominic. He tried to kill him. The knight coming into the room is the only reason he didn't.


That is assumption. If Siggy killed Dominic, then he definitely couldn't help his Dad. I wager Siggy would leave him a bloody mangled heap, like the first time they met.

Only this time Dominic would deserve it.
Back to top Go down
Iron King




Joined : 07 Aug 2007
Posts : 417
Location : The Best Penal Colony Ever

PostSubject: Re: 14/09/07 Milov SMASH   Sun Sep 16, 2007 4:21 pm

No.
Back to top Go down
[Banned by request]
Left the forum
Left the forum



Joined : 29 Apr 2007
Posts : 732

PostSubject: Re: 14/09/07 Milov SMASH   Sun Sep 16, 2007 4:49 pm

Dotty wrote:
Jhaiisiin wrote:
Dotty wrote:
Thus why Siggy smacks him in the face. It's one of the few times Siggy wailed on someone where I actually agreed with it. Dominic needed that. Playing god is a no-no.

So if someone refused to help one of your family members, you'd be okay with nearly killing them for it? Because Siggy didn't just "smack" Dominic. He tried to kill him. The knight coming into the room is the only reason he didn't.


That is assumption. If Siggy killed Dominic, then he definitely couldn't help his Dad. I wager Siggy would leave him a bloody mangled heap, like the first time they met.

Only this time Dominic would deserve it.


It's an 'assumption' that Siggy himself acknowledged was true, Dotty. He wasn't beating up on Dominic to make a point (like he did the first time they met). He wasn't even beating on someone who had resisted arrest (however non-violently), like he did with Gregory. It was painfully obvious that his thought-process, to the point that he had one, was, "Since you aren't helping my father, I'm going to at least make sure you go to the grave first." Or rather, more akin to, "Dominic betray Siggy? Siggy crush Dominic!!"
Back to top Go down

14/09/07 Milov SMASH

View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 4 of 4Goto page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

Permissions of this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Dominic Deegan Fansite :: Comic Discussion :: Plot Discourse-