|
Goto page : 1, 2, 3  |
| Author | Message |
|---|
Maulkin Shivering Isles Resident


Joined : 26 Mar 2007 Posts : 9412
| Subject: Problem: Fri Apr 04, 2008 12:37 am | |
| Should the sub bosses (ie, me, Faceless, and Shogo) have rivals if they're, you know, the sub boss? A person who has me as their rival could have to face two bosses, and an evil character who has me as their rival would fight their rival and the mini-boss at the same time...
Anyway, I'm thinking that the mini-bosses shouldn't be an option for a rival. _________________
|
|
 | |
Faceless 99% Spam Guaranteed!


Age : 17 Joined : 21 Oct 2007 Posts : 4822 Location : On a mountain......IN SPACE
| Subject: Re: Problem: Fri Apr 04, 2008 12:44 am | |
| We have mini-bosses? I was not aware of this. I thought it was rival battle-Devourer battle-FINAL BOSS. _________________ "Crazy? No, I'm sane. God am I sane."
| Spoiler: | | |  |
|
|
 | |
Ark S Ranked


Age : 18 Joined : 22 Jan 2008 Posts : 3978 Location : Ontario,Canada
| |
 | |
Maulkin Shivering Isles Resident


Joined : 26 Mar 2007 Posts : 9412
| Subject: Re: Problem: Fri Apr 04, 2008 12:48 am | |
| So, it's Forumites -> Rival -> Mini Boss -> Devourer? _________________
|
|
 | |
Faceless 99% Spam Guaranteed!


Age : 17 Joined : 21 Oct 2007 Posts : 4822 Location : On a mountain......IN SPACE
| Subject: Re: Problem: Fri Apr 04, 2008 12:50 am | |
| | Ark wrote: | Either that or they faced their rivals, then face a different mini-boss.
Yeah, the Mini bosses are Maulkin, you and Shogo Faceless. |
I was not told of this. EXPLAIN! _________________ "Crazy? No, I'm sane. God am I sane."
| Spoiler: | | |  |
|
|
 | |
Drouth Forum Espada


Age : 16 Joined : 16 Mar 2008 Posts : 546 Location : Not Holland apparently.
| Subject: Re: Problem: Fri Apr 04, 2008 1:13 am | |
| Why can't the rivals just be the Mini-boss? I mean they're the god damned rival! _________________

 |
|
 | |
Maulkin Shivering Isles Resident


Joined : 26 Mar 2007 Posts : 9412
| Subject: Re: Problem: Fri Apr 04, 2008 1:20 am | |
| Faceless, we needs help! Decide what we're gonna do!!!
My vote: to simplify matters, we simply go Forumites -> Rival -> Devourer, rather than having mini-bosses between Rival and Devourer. It would also allow for more playable characters, as the bosses would have to be unlockable. _________________
|
|
 | |
Faceless 99% Spam Guaranteed!


Age : 17 Joined : 21 Oct 2007 Posts : 4822 Location : On a mountain......IN SPACE
| Subject: Re: Problem: Fri Apr 04, 2008 1:25 am | |
| The idea was that you would fight other forumites, then your rival, then the Devourer. However, some people said we should have another boss after Devourer as the FINAL boss, though we might not do that. I like Forumites -> Rival -> Devourer, that's how it should go. _________________ "Crazy? No, I'm sane. God am I sane."
| Spoiler: | | |  |
|
|
 | |
Drouth Forum Espada


Age : 16 Joined : 16 Mar 2008 Posts : 546 Location : Not Holland apparently.
| Subject: Re: Problem: Fri Apr 04, 2008 1:28 am | |
| I agree with Faceless, he is wise beyond his years.  _________________

 |
|
 | |
BladedFalcon Professional Blade-For-Hire


Age : 20 Joined : 27 Feb 2008 Posts : 6480 Location : Mexico
| Subject: Re: Problem: Fri Apr 04, 2008 3:52 am | |
| Eh well, yeah.. i suppose it could be more simple that wa, i mean, the sub-boss was an interesting idea, but maulkin has a point in there, and since faceless has stated he does not want them, i think th "mini-boss" idea should be scrapped, altough storyline wise those three could still be threated as the "protagonists"... _________________ Hell Hath no fury like a woman you really shouldn't have slept with.

|
|
 | |
Porgon All According To Plan


Age : 19 Joined : 10 Sep 2007 Posts : 553 Location : Horribly Lost.
| Subject: Re: Problem: Fri Apr 04, 2008 11:42 am | |
| I think it should be like 3 battles -> Rival -> 2 more battles -> miniboss -> devourer or life
the 5 battles being random battles - where the only one you know it won't be is your specific miniboss, rival, or devourer of life (so you still might fight character XYZ though your alignment normally wouldn't) _________________
[This signature has been removed due to a Copyright claim by The Church of Scientology] |
|
 | |
Marsco I Saw The Sign


Age : 19 Joined : 07 Dec 2007 Posts : 2436 Location : 19 miles outside the windy city
| Subject: Re: Problem: Fri Apr 04, 2008 11:46 am | |
| | Make a poll with the 3 different ideas and see which gets the most votes, then work the game around it. |
|
 | |
Oblivion Magicite Madman


Age : 23 Joined : 17 Sep 2007 Posts : 1976 Location : Lurking in the Attic
| Subject: Re: Problem: Fri Apr 04, 2008 12:09 pm | |
| I like Porgon's suggestion... but it seems really short. I was thinking 10 battles or so total, so maybe more like:
5/6 Battles -> Rival -> 2/3 Battles -> Miniboss -> Devourer _________________
| Spoiler: | | |  HM #32, #34 |
|
|
 | |
Ark S Ranked


Age : 18 Joined : 22 Jan 2008 Posts : 3978 Location : Ontario,Canada
| |
 | |
MessiahForHire Mischief and Mayhem


Joined : 10 Oct 2007 Posts : 3576
| Subject: Re: Problem: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:11 pm | |
| ...What about the FINAL BOSS? We have to keep that in there... or should we keep it a secret battle for after the Devourer dies? _________________ *Insert evil laugh here*
| Spoiler: | | |  |
 Click here to feed me a Rare Candy! (Don't ask me how a pokeball can eat a candy. <.<) |
|
 | |
|